An Analysis Of Emily Dickinson s Send No Money

Power and powerlessness are prominent themes common in both Emily Dickinson’s and Phillip Larkin’s poems. The idea of whom or what is in control and how power is obtained are explored. Both poets predominantly explore the idea that power primarily belongs to a male figure. However, in Larkin’s ‘Send No Money’ the speaker is portrayed to be powerless against an abstract idea rather than a physical, human being as shown in Dickinson’s ‘754’. This shows how both poets have many similarities in the manner in which they write about power and powerlessness. Both poets explore that ideas of power and powerlessness but one aspect of their writing that cannot be ignored is the time the poems were written in and the perspective they were written from. Dickinson is writing her poems from the eyes of a woman in the 19th century. Whereas Larkin wrote his poems around a century later when the times had changed and society had evolved. His poems are of course from the viewpoint of a traditional male writing around the 1950’s and onwards. It is interesting to note that neither poet married during their lifetime. Emily Dickinson was a recluse who preferred to live a solitary life and avoided interaction with outside people. Phillip Larkin could not commit himself into a long relationship. They both experienced loneliness in life where they couldn’t experience the struggle for power in relationships meaning they experienced power in different aspects. Dickinson was a deeply religious personShow MoreRelatedMarketing Mistakes and Successes175322 Words   |  702 Pagesfollowing classification of cases by subject matter to be helpful. I thank those of you who made this and other suggestions. Classification of Cases by Major Marketing Topics Topics Most Relevant Cases Marketing Research and Consumer Analysis Coca-Cola, Disney, McDonald’s, Google, Starbucks Product Starbucks, Nike, Coke/Pepsi, McDonald’s, Maytag, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Newell Rubbermaid, DaimlerChrysler, Kmart/Sears, Harley-Davidson, Boeing/Airbus, Merck, Boston Beer, Firestone/FordRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 PagesII Bomber Discovered Intact on Surface of Moon. You didnt know that, did you? Well, it wouldnt be logical to believe it. Why not? Here are three reasons: (1) Bombers cant fly to the moon, (2) no one is going to bust the national budget to send one there by rocket ship, and (3) there arent any alien-piloted UFOs that snatch military antiques. The principle behind this logical reasoning is: Use your background knowledge and common sense in drawing conclusions. The second choice is